It now, "Murayama statement" a review of
He was chief of air staff Tamogami
Article Tamogami the incident as a typical criticism,
"Article Tamogami is forgotten position hasty action"
Is that you.
The contents of the paper aside, the people in positions like that, the problem is that a paper with a political intention went Oh, you say that.
He is, what will the consequences of this paper, how did you apply for a hastily without thinking at all.
Or do you never thought of taking the grand prize to be announced No way.
Still, Mr. Tamogami Actually, the organizers in advance "what really OK" and was reminded.
Tamogami (it is multipurpose) long before air staff, Toshio (60) (October 31 date with the Air Staff Office), but the issue was dismissed over the contents of the papers submitted and for the Showa War, Mr. Tamogami When choosing the best paper award from the Jury "and selected papers, the position of the head or curtain of air is fine," and indicated the concerns, it was taken for confirmation by the sponsor one person It was revealed yesterday.
According to Professor Emeritus of Sophia Watanabe Syouiti Chief Judge, then from the organizers, "(from his) and got the confirmation right," and briefed, he chose to award the work of Tamogami said.
(Consent prior to curtain length Maezora Paper Award, the organizers "a person to see": Social: YOMIURI ONLINE (Yomiuri Shimbun))
These controversial, dismissal, there are voices that deserve punishment, his was probably decided on this action and prepared for it.
1978, once, was chairman of the Joint Staff Council Kurisu "what if you are forced to act in the law" is that the case was dismissed with the remark, this "paper Tamogami incident" is that debate over the defense of our country, that will stimulate the debate historical awareness.
In fact, the front page of every national newspaper with the form of news reporting, "Japan has not invaded a country" "Hikizurikoma to war victims during the day by Chiang Kai-shek" "non-Asian countries and South Korea is grateful to the people of Greater East Asia War that "I was on from the claim, such as the ongoing post-war regime, the purpose of mind control situation stir the Tokyo trial, and say what was not fully achieved.
SDF has also been armed guerrillas attacked a country, even if you can not fight back until the damage here.
The rocket launcher can only fight back Without the other side here with automatic weapons. From which the defense is over.
What am I going with this defense system.
Japan's diplomacy "Asia" is like a day 10 years "apology and regret the past" "the suffering of colonization" responsibility "aggression", "Japanese militarism" in South Korea 言I募Ru, and then kneel on the ground indefinitely only keep sending money.
This "Asian diplomacy" What good.
This paper has now become official government prima facie "Murayama statement" is contrary to that problem.
In the story of the century that nonsense Why do the contents of the statement does not 論Jiyou Murayama again.
Japan, a period of not too distant past, a mistaken national policy, entrapped in a fateful crisis, the people on the road to war, by colonial rule and aggression, many countries, especially Asian countries, people of great loss for our pain and gave. I (Tomiichi Murayama) is therefore false to the future is to Chi無Karashi noodles, Humbly acknowledging this irrefutable facts of history, once again expressed its deep remorse here and feelings of sincere apology will be expressed.
(Statement by Prime Minister Murayama)
This time Prime Minister Murayama's "discourse" is the opinion issued in the form said. And when you look at it, they are too biased, it seems to be consensus in Japan as a nation which has a big problem.
Murayama, Prime Minister Aso's statement "adhere" I have made it clear, this is an obvious mistake.
Now is the Murayama statement (the Kono Statement, incidentally), a radical revision, among nations as legitimate, Japan Japan, with a view of history, I think at a time立Chi向Kaubeki a national crisis.
Far East powder keg situation in the continent and the peninsula Shina, allowing more utopian pacifism in Japan may Kurenai.
← click the support!
Yesterday was 82nd. At last two digits short, Thanks! Position today?
Evaluation of this article:
(Not yet rated) 
Loading ... Categories: frankness topical | Tags: Greater East Asia War, Politics, History | 
November 4, 2008 at 8:13 PM
Currently, as Japan upset the Murayama statement is difficult.
If you do not have to keep from consistency and continuity as the country's foreign policy.
Japan will lose credibility and trust as a nation and turn it against another country.
2005 the Murayama statement by April 22, Prime Minister Koizumi has already stated that adhere in a speech at the Asia-Africa conference date can only deny the statement is not simply Murayama.
Speeches from Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi that Japan, China and Korea as a prior step of the plot were stained with trying to kneel on the ground again to Japan in the international conference on the bash and nothing to apologize for the war that the international community so far ahead in In the circumstances, is held under the order to defuse the situation.
Prime Minister Koizumi's speech ① situation in Japan has already shown the Murayama statement, "』 Asian countries have spent the apology, including the inconvenience, "he said of criticism of Japan and South Korea indicates it is claimed, 貰I ② is also a witness to a meeting of Asian and African countries that Japan has already apologized, ③ moved to prevent future similar criticism from China and South Korea later is intended to be made as a preventative.
So after Japanese Prime Minister is not required to take the attitude that to prevent this kind of controversy always from South Korea and Koizumi's speech followed the discourse and Murayama.
If you review the discourse and Murayama if I need to do that which does not conflict with Japan's attitude to the Eternal on 見計Ratta the situation provided a very carefully timed. The current situation is I look at the situation there looks like.
◎ 2005 April 22, Prime Minister Koizumi's speech at the meeting of Asian and African Sun
http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/koizumispeech/2005/04/22speech.html
◎ had been watching the situation at the time Sure 2ch (to taste what a good atmosphere at the time)
http://yas2.hp.infoseek.co.jp/log3/koizumi-109.htm
January 18, 2009 at 7:47 PM
> Nisekuro I mean, black's fake! ? It is us after a long time! (初Memashi If the wrong person)
But if the U.S. President or such 代替Wari "Vietnam War was a failure," or, right to negate the previous president's discourse and national policy.
"Murayama statement" is a mere statement. The problem is "not an apology" "apologize" and did not correspond perfectly to the criticism of South Korea claimed it was done using the Murayama statement "Koizumi's speech" is a concession paid by the successful The diversification they did I was not to violate the national interest and in perspective, I think.
I do not 謝Rubeki, the Murayama statement of apology that I have had 謝Ranaku the first place, and Kono. Tachiyukanai that if diplomacy and Japan do not follow this standpoint that I think is funny at all.
After the overturn, when the opportunity the situation fully, carefully prepared, I think that's true. Discourse as Murayama's Socialist Party at the time, I guess you should go in fully prepared.
February 2, 2009 at 6:09 PM
Us. Fake it is black. Then I Go無沙汰.
If the United States and Japan have not discussed it with players of equal rank in the top post-war system of the state's hegemony.
Japan also adopted the Nde I played a consistent way to get confidence in the firm continued to change, not only dull Prime-flop, or it is not Yappa office pointed out.
If Japan's position that it is a rebel from the Allied cause in World War subdue them with the collapse of the regime and corner of the Big Five of the League of Nations. Under the current international order is in the circumstance and I think I always have to prove that I should not plotting an insurrection. In addition to a daimyo.
Deny such a simple background is Murayama's statement was received as I could trying to overthrow the regime after the war.
U.S. is very nervous about it, "break from the postwar regime," Prime Minister Abe to the United States has promised to raise the alert level, taking an attitude of indifference Temashita much.
There is no reason for this reversal and recipe development 1, 100 from the year 200 of endurance and I think that until I happen to disrupt Dynasty overthrow the current regime was the place for hours certain Asian countries.
The simple but comfortable and is most active in the winning side by Japan in World War caused the town.
Hatsune Miku good one, but then does not matter at all.
Or pigeons or spotted or melt through Ku or how many colors it 2008 or PV.
I laughed to see that out in a separate volume that features Miku Hatsune Eureka So. This Nanzo.
February 7, 2009 at 4:27 PM
Well, to truly view the house of the Three Kingdoms will be helpful.
But Socialist government first place "Murayama statement" the situation, I can not say I think it also playing solid Na in Japan.
Even daimyo daimyo, Sunao Yasushi is not to subdue the Choshu, Satsuma is I want to have stockpiled arms diplomatic efforts. The overthrow of the government and obsession!
I'm thinking very long, so unwelcome to fake a black historian, teacher, and not 死Nemasen overturned just after looking at the post-war system of their own is alive!
I laughed at the end really does not matter or Hatsune Miku. Text site is obsolete, the Internet is also interesting today.